Click on the blue article title to read full story.


Cobalt & Bismuth
Canadian Mining Journal • April 03, 2026 • 6:22 PM
Why Canada still ships its future offshore

A mineral supply chain may begin with geology, but it ends with power…The big challenge remains beyond meaningful public engagement. If one succeeds in mining commercial quantities of critical minerals, where do they go next? Before they can be used in any project for electrification, high technology, defence, or other deployment, they must be refined. The truth here is that minerals extracted in Canada are largely shipped overseas, almost always to China, where they will be refined for sale to end users…The dependence is not merely overwhelming; it is structural. China alone controls approximately 85% of global rare earth elements’ (REEs) processing capacity, refines 73% of the world’s cobalt, 59% of lithium, and 68% of nickel. For some minerals, the concentration is even more extreme…The gap between extraction and value-added processing is more than a missed opportunity; it is an ongoing transfer or economic rent and strategic control out of the country. Mineralized material shipped offshore entrenches this dependency…Rising demand for materials increases Canada’s exposure and reliance on foreign processing and supply. Electrification, data centres, artificial intelligence, and defence onshoring all lean directly on processing capacity that Canada does not control…Even with concerted effort now supporting a handful of new facilities, the urgent need for a broader approach is evident. A project or two does not build systemic capacity, and without systemic capacity, the commercial and national security threats persist unabated…While Canada is floating ideas, the U.S. is starting to underwrite outcomes. Deals with price floors, stockpiles, and long dated financing priced near treasury rates reflect a recognition that critical minerals are crucial infrastructure, not just commodities. Canada has yet to make that leap.

RealClearDefense • April 03, 2026 • 1:00 AM
How China Dominates the World’s Critical Minerals Production

Critical minerals are mined all over the world but the majority of the supply ends up passing through China. For a broad range of key metals and minerals, China is either the largest miner, the dominant refiner, or both. This is true for rare earths, lithium, cobalt, graphite, nickel, and many other metals and minerals that are essential to defense, energy and high-tech applications. It is less about where ores are dug out of the ground and more about where they are turned into usable components. In other words, Chinese processing plants are essentially the gatekeepers of global supply…China built those downstream industries at scale over decades through state support and investment. The result is clear — China has effectively monopolized refining for most critical minerals while the rest of the world depends on it for much-needed supply…Put simply: control of smelters and refineries is the chokepoint…Many minerals that are mined in other countries are still processed into a refined product within China. That clear advantage lets Chinese policy shifts ripple quickly through global supply and pricing — a growing threat for the West…In fact, China has already weaponized its stronghold on the industry in ways that have triggered both concern and action from the United States government. Over the past couple of years, Beijing has imposed a series of export restrictions on critical minerals that have sounded alarms in Washington…This caused semiconductor and defense firms to scramble for alternatives while exposing how dangerously dependent manufacturers are on Chinese supply…These actions have shaped how Western governments view critical minerals. What were once perceived as simply commodities are now seen as strategic assets crucial to national defense. U.S. officials have become increasingly vocal about reliance on China for critical minerals and the associated risks, prompting government action to reduce exposure. These maneuvers include billions of dollars of investment into domestic production, executive orders empowering the Defense Production Act to boost U.S. mining and refining, and coordinated international initiatives to strengthen supply chains outside of China.

For further information about the NICO Project and its Mineral Reserves, please refer to the Technical Report on the Feasibility Study for NICO, entitled "Technical Report on the Feasibility Study for the NICO-Gold-Cobalt-Bismuth-Copper Project, Northwest Territories, Canada", dated April 2, 2014 and prepared by Micon, which has been filed on SEDAR and is available under the Company's profile at www.sedar.com. DISCLAIMER Fortune Minerals Limited does not endorse or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of any third party publication regarding the Company and accepts no liability for any direct or consequential losses arising from its use. The information contained in third party publications is subject to verification by the user and Fortune is under no obligation to provide, or comment upon, such publications. This communication is not, and under no circumstances is to be construed as, an offer to sell or a solicitation to buy any securities. Any decision to invest in securities in the secondary market or otherwise should only be made after consulting the investor’s own investment, legal, accounting and tax advisors in order to make an informed determination of the suitability and consequences of such investment. CAUTIONARY STATEMENT ON FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION The materials appearing in this email contain forward-looking information. This forward-looking information includes, or may be based upon, estimates, forecasts, and statements as to management’s expectations with respect to, among other things, the size and quality of the Company’s mineral resources, progress in permitting and development of mineral properties, timing and cost for placing the Company’s mineral projects into production, costs of production, amount and quality of metal products recoverable from the Company’s mineral resources, anticipated revenues, earnings and cash flows from the Company's mineral projects, demand and market outlook for metals and coal and future metal and coal prices. Forward-looking information is based on the opinions and estimates of management at the date the information is given, and is subject to a variety of risks and uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual events or results to differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking information. These factors include the inherent risks involved in the exploration and development of mineral properties, uncertainties with respect to the receipt or timing of required permits and regulatory approvals, the uncertainties involved in interpreting drilling results and other geological data, fluctuating metal and coal prices, the possibility of project cost overruns or unanticipated costs and expenses, the possibility that production from the Company's mineral projects may be less than anticipated, uncertainties relating to the availability and costs of financing needed in the future, uncertainties related to metal recoveries and other factors. Mineral resources that are not mineral reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability. Inferred mineral resources are considered too speculative geologically to have economic considerations applied to them that would enable them to be categorized as mineral reserves. There is no certainty that mineral resources will be converted into mineral reserves. Readers are cautioned to not place undue reliance on forward-looking information because it is possible that predictions, forecasts, projections and other forms of forward-looking information will not be achieved by the Company. The forward-looking information contained herein is made as of the date hereof and the Company assumes no responsibility to update them or revise it to reflect new events or circumstances, except as required by law.
© 2025 Meltwater. All Rights Reserved.

To unsubscribe from this newsletter Click Here