Click on the blue article title to read full story.
Excerpt from August 14, 2025, BMO Metals Brief: Yesterday, the US Department of Energy announced the intention to issue notices of funding opportunities (NOFOs) totalling nearly $1B to speed development of US critical minerals and materials supply chains. Proposed NOFOs include: $50M for a critical minerals technology accelerator aimed at the processing of rare earths, semiconductor metals and lithium extraction; $250M for producing by-products from industrial processes; $135M for recovering rare earths from mine tailings and waste streams; $500M for battery materials and recycling; and $40M to extract critical minerals from wastewater. We note that the principal focus of this announcement is on metals processing, recycling and waste treatment, with limited mention of mining or resource extraction. As noted in our recent critical minerals report, while critical minerals remains a key policy focus for many countries, very few are willing to spend large amounts of capital on it, with the USA a notable exception. Excerpt from August 13, 2025, BMO Metals Brief: Growing trade barriers in critical minerals: We have published a report giving a high-level overview of trade restrictions and policy decisions in the critical minerals space. Despite only making up 3% of global trade, critical minerals represent ~30% of all export restrictions introduced worldwide since 2010. Most restrictions take the form of export licensing requirements and export taxes, with only ~10% of all restrictions being outright bans (mostly for waste, scrap, or ore containing critical minerals). The topic has become a key policy theme in recent years as a result, with almost every developed country publishing a critical minerals list or strategic plan; however, concrete financial commitments remain scarce (with the conspicuous exception of the USA), and only five countries actively maintain a stockpile of critical minerals. |
|
Cobalt & Bismuth |
|
Reuters - August 13, 2025
US Department of Energy Secretary Chris Wright testifies before the House Committee on Appropriations Subcommittee on Energy on Capitol ...
US Department of Energy Secretary Chris Wright testifies before the House Committee on Appropriations Subcommittee on Energy on Capitol ...
The Trump administration is proposing nearly $1 billion in funding to speed the development of U.S. critical minerals and materials, used in everything from electric vehicle batteries to semiconductors, the Energy Department said on Wednesday…The department intends to offer funding to advance and scale up mining, processing and manufacturing technologies in the critical minerals and materials supply chains, sectors that have been dominated by China and other countries, the statement said…"For too long, the United States has relied on foreign actors to supply and process the critical materials that are essential to modern life and our national security," said Energy Secretary Chris Wright.
|
Reuters - August 12, 2025
Australia rescued a key metals refiner, but more is needed
Australia rescued a key metals refiner, but more is needed
It may seem like a small sum but the $87 million the Australian government is handing to two metal smelters owned by global commodity major Trafigura may turn out to be the start of a big deal…Nyrstar put its troubled Port Pirie lead smelter in South Australia and Hobart zinc processing operations in Tasmania under strategic review earlier this year, citing high energy prices and lower processing fees…Nyrstar is far from the only Western company battling low margins at metal processing plants as the industry battles both overcapacity and China's increasing dominance and cost advantages…The problem for Western governments is that they are increasingly worried about becoming too reliant on China not only for minerals such as rare earths, but also for refined metals such as copper, nickel, manganese, aluminium, zinc and lead…But the money is also going to be used to allow Nyrstar to study whether it can also use the plants to produce other critical minerals including antimony, bismuth, germanium and indium….If it is assumed that it is indeed feasible to produce these minerals at the plants, the question then becomes how governments such as those in Australia, the United States and Europe work to ensure that the new capability is viable…It is patently clear that Western private companies cannot produce refined metals at prices competitive with those made by Chinese producers…What are the best ways for Western countries to ensure they keep existing metal refining capacity, as well as build new capability to ensure they can control supply chains for critical minerals?...What is more sustainable is ensuring a pricing and offtake system that provides certainty for companies investing in mining and refining critical minerals…The track record of Western governments in successfully enabling critical minerals development and refining is far from encouraging…But perhaps the decision by Australia to subsidise Nyrstar is a welcome realisation that the problem is real and needs solutions sooner rather than later.
|
|
|
|
 |
For further information about the NICO Project and its Mineral Reserves, please refer to the Technical Report on the Feasibility Study for NICO, entitled "Technical Report on the Feasibility Study for the NICO-Gold-Cobalt-Bismuth-Copper Project, Northwest Territories, Canada", dated April 2, 2014 and prepared by Micon, which has been filed on SEDAR and is available under the Company's profile at www.sedar.com.
DISCLAIMER
Fortune Minerals Limited does not endorse or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of any third party publication regarding the Company and accepts no liability for any direct or consequential losses arising from its use. The information contained in third party publications is subject to verification by the user and Fortune is under no obligation to provide, or comment upon, such publications. This communication is not, and under no circumstances is to be construed as, an offer to sell or a solicitation to buy any securities. Any decision to invest in securities in the secondary market or otherwise should only be made after consulting the investor’s own investment, legal, accounting and tax advisors in order to make an informed determination of the suitability and consequences of such investment.
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT ON FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION
The materials appearing in this email contain forward-looking information. This forward-looking information includes, or may be based upon, estimates, forecasts, and statements as to management’s expectations with respect to, among other things, the size and quality of the Company’s mineral resources, progress in permitting and development of mineral properties, timing and cost for placing the Company’s mineral projects into production, costs of production, amount and quality of metal products recoverable from the Company’s mineral resources, anticipated revenues, earnings and cash flows from the Company's mineral projects, demand and market outlook for metals and coal and future metal and coal prices. Forward-looking information is based on the opinions and estimates of management at the date the information is given, and is subject to a variety of risks and uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual events or results to differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking information. These factors include the inherent risks involved in the exploration and development of mineral properties, uncertainties with respect to the receipt or timing of required permits and regulatory approvals, the uncertainties involved in interpreting drilling results and other geological data, fluctuating metal and coal prices, the possibility of project cost overruns or unanticipated costs and expenses, the possibility that production from the Company's mineral projects may be less than anticipated, uncertainties relating to the availability and costs of financing needed in the future, uncertainties related to metal recoveries and other factors. Mineral resources that are not mineral reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability. Inferred mineral resources are considered too speculative geologically to have economic considerations applied to them that would enable them to be categorized as mineral reserves. There is no certainty that mineral resources will be converted into mineral reserves. Readers are cautioned to not place undue reliance on forward-looking information because it is possible that predictions, forecasts, projections and other forms of forward-looking information will not be achieved by the Company. The forward-looking information contained herein is made as of the date hereof and the Company assumes no responsibility to update them or revise it to reflect new events or circumstances, except as required by law.
|
|
|