Click on the blue article title to read full story.
https://bipartisanpolicy.org/letter/letter-to-congress-on-price-support-for-u-s-critical-minerals/ Excerpt from Dec 3, 2024, Letter to Congress on Price Support for U.S. Critical Minerals: We are encouraged by the recent bipartisan interest in supporting the U.S. critical mineral and material industry. American critical mineral and material capacity, particularly for the processing sector that turns raw ores into the purified minerals needed for modern technologies, is crucial to securing our supply chains, boosting economic competitiveness, deploying advanced energy technologies, and ensuring national security. Without these investments, the U.S. will become increasingly reliant on fragile supply chains dominated by China, which controls 57% of lithium, 77% of cobalt, 92% of rare earth elements, 91% of natural graphite, 80% of gallium, and 60% of germanium processing capacities within its borders. In addition, China further dominates mineral markets, such as nickel, cobalt, and lithium, through ventures abroad…China has shown its willingness to leverage its dominance in critical mineral and material production by engaging in unfair trade practices, flooding markets, driving down prices, and forcing domestic projects to scale back or shutter. Regardless of profitability, China’s subsidized mining and mineral processors can continue to increase output and distort markets. These challenges highlight the urgent need to diversify mineral and material supply chains with increased domestic feedstocks and processing capacity. While existing grants and loans help with capital costs, they are insufficient to meet our supply chain challenges. For a fully integrated U.S. mineral supply chain to prosper and support manufacturing and industrial demands, additional measures are needed to ensure these projects can sell at prices that justify investment…To counter this alarming market dominance and unlock substantial private investment, the U.S. needs federal price support for critical minerals and materials as a key part of its strategy to secure supply chains. As outlined in the Bipartisan Policy Center’s recent report, Resilient Resource Reserve: A Plan to Catalyze the American Critical Mineral Processing Industry, federal price support can provide the certainty needed to build and scale domestic projects. |
|
Cobalt |
|
Reuters - December 6, 2024
The flag of China is placed next to the elements of Gallium and Germanium on a periodic table, in this illustration picture taken on July 6 ...
China's trade restrictions on strategic minerals are starting to hit Western companies where it hurts…Blaming Beijing's curbs on antimony exports announced in August, German chemicals and consumer goods heavyweight Henkel told customers last month it had declared force majeure and suspended deliveries of four types of adhesives and lubricants widely used by automakers, according to a Nov. 8 letter to clients reviewed by Reuters…The letter from Henkel, which had not been reported previously, and conversations with more than two dozen traders, miners, processors, end-users, and industry experts in North America, Europe and China underscore the severe disruption caused by Beijing's trade restrictions and highlight how Western players' struggle to replace China-based supply chains…The price of antimony, scarce in nature but essential for military equipment such as ammunition, infrared missiles, nuclear weapons, and night vision goggles, rallied nearly 230% this year to about $39,000 per metric ton in Rotterdam's busy spot market, according to market intelligence provider Argus…China is the world's largest antimony producer and dominates the production of many strategic materials…Beijing's restrictions bring added urgency for Western players to cut their reliance on minerals from China…But new mines can take years to develop, leaving players like Henkel scrambling to find alternatives, which are often more costly…Meanwhile, some Western miners and processors have started to build up capacity…United States Antimony, the only North American processor of the metal, made plans to lift output at its Montana smelter, which was running at 50% of capacity after China announced curbs on antimony exports in August…"Our decision to ramp up production was predominantly triggered by the more than tripling of worldwide Rotterdam antimony prices," the company's chairman, Gary Evans, told Reuters…China's restrictions "created significantly more demand for our finished products," he added…Orders at Ottawa-based Northern Graphite, which touts itself as North America's only producer of natural flake graphite, jumped 50% in the aftermath of China's graphite curbs announced in October 2023, CEO Hugues Jacquemin told Reuters…Canadian miner Teck Resources, which produces germanium as a byproduct at its Red Dog zinc mine in Alaska and is the only supplier of the metal in North America, told Reuters it was studying whether to boost output of the critical material there now that China has blocked exports to the United States…China's export squeeze has triggered a surge in prices for many strategic minerals…For end-users, China's restrictions underscore the importance of supply diversification…"When you de-risk, you need to de-risk with different levers," said Maxime Picat, chief purchasing officer at automaker Stellantis. "If you are a one-solution company, knowing that your battery suppliers are all Chinese or all Korean, then you are at risk."
|
MIT Technology Review - December 6, 2024
The nation has signaled it’s prepared to hit back harder still, in ways that could inflict serious economic pain on its biggest economic ...
This week, China banned exports of several critical minerals to the US, marking the latest move in an escalating series of tit-for-tat trade restrictions between the world’s two largest economies…In explicitly cutting off, rather than merely restricting, materials of strategic importance to the semiconductor, defense, and electric vehicle sectors, China has clearly crossed a new line in the long-simmering trade war…At the same time, it selected minerals that won’t cripple any industries—which leaves China plenty of ammunition to inflict greater economic pain in response to any further trade restrictions that the incoming Trump administration may impose…The president-elect recently pledged to impose an additional 10% tariff on all Chinese goods, and he floated tariff rates as high as 60% to 100% during his campaign. But China, which dominates the supply chains for numerous critical minerals essential to high-tech sectors, seems to be telegraphing that it’s prepared to hit back hard…China immediately banned exports of gallium, germanium, antimony, and so called “superhard materials” used heavily in manufacturing, arguing that they have both military and civilian applications, according to the New York Times…The nation said it may also further restrict sales of graphite, which makes up most of the material in the lithium-ion battery anodes used in electric vehicles, grid storage plants, and consumer electronics…“The challenge China faces is that most of its techniques to increase pain by disrupting supply chains would also impact China, which itself is connected to these supply chains,” says Chris Miller, a professor at Tufts University and author of Chip War: The Fight for the World’s Most Critical Technology…Notably, the latest announcement could compel US companies to develop their own sources of gallium and germanium, which can be extracted as by-products of zinc and aluminum mining…Wang says that China’s ban might prove “shortsighted,” as any success in diversifying these global supply chains will weaken the nation’s grip in the areas it now dominates…“It’s hard to see a Trump 2.0 de-escalating with China,” Baskaran says. “We’re on a one-way trajectory toward continued escalation; the question is the pace and the form. It’s not really an ‘if” question.”
|
|
|
|
|
For further information about the NICO Project and its Mineral Reserves, please refer to the Technical Report on the Feasibility Study for NICO, entitled "Technical Report on the Feasibility Study for the NICO-Gold-Cobalt-Bismuth-Copper Project, Northwest Territories, Canada", dated April 2, 2014 and prepared by Micon, which has been filed on SEDAR and is available under the Company's profile at www.sedar.com.
DISCLAIMER
Fortune Minerals Limited does not endorse or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of any third party publication regarding the Company and accepts no liability for any direct or consequential losses arising from its use. The information contained in third party publications is subject to verification by the user and Fortune is under no obligation to provide, or comment upon, such publications. This communication is not, and under no circumstances is to be construed as, an offer to sell or a solicitation to buy any securities. Any decision to invest in securities in the secondary market or otherwise should only be made after consulting the investor’s own investment, legal, accounting and tax advisors in order to make an informed determination of the suitability and consequences of such investment.
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT ON FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION
The materials appearing in this email contain forward-looking information. This forward-looking information includes, or may be based upon, estimates, forecasts, and statements as to management’s expectations with respect to, among other things, the size and quality of the Company’s mineral resources, progress in permitting and development of mineral properties, timing and cost for placing the Company’s mineral projects into production, costs of production, amount and quality of metal products recoverable from the Company’s mineral resources, anticipated revenues, earnings and cash flows from the Company's mineral projects, demand and market outlook for metals and coal and future metal and coal prices. Forward-looking information is based on the opinions and estimates of management at the date the information is given, and is subject to a variety of risks and uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual events or results to differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking information. These factors include the inherent risks involved in the exploration and development of mineral properties, uncertainties with respect to the receipt or timing of required permits and regulatory approvals, the uncertainties involved in interpreting drilling results and other geological data, fluctuating metal and coal prices, the possibility of project cost overruns or unanticipated costs and expenses, the possibility that production from the Company's mineral projects may be less than anticipated, uncertainties relating to the availability and costs of financing needed in the future, uncertainties related to metal recoveries and other factors. Mineral resources that are not mineral reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability. Inferred mineral resources are considered too speculative geologically to have economic considerations applied to them that would enable them to be categorized as mineral reserves. There is no certainty that mineral resources will be converted into mineral reserves. Readers are cautioned to not place undue reliance on forward-looking information because it is possible that predictions, forecasts, projections and other forms of forward-looking information will not be achieved by the Company. The forward-looking information contained herein is made as of the date hereof and the Company assumes no responsibility to update them or revise it to reflect new events or circumstances, except as required by law.
|
|
|